All Articles Mixing & Mastering
快速提示:消减VS添加剂均衡
Mo Volans on Fri, January 14th 1 comments
When enhancing your sounds with EQ there is a fine line between a light sweetening and an over-colored, or over-hyped end result. Most of the time any negative results are due to too much additive equ

提高您的声音与均衡时,有一个细线条之间的光甜味剂和色,或过度炒作的最终结果。任何负面的结果是由于过多的添加剂均衡的大部分的时间太多,换句话说,争取在任何一个特定的频段。

相对初学者可能会认为使用添加剂的均衡是唯一的途径,以提高他们的声音,但还有另一种途径。让我们快速浏览一下...

01 - 使用添加剂的情商

所以如果你是新来消减均衡技术的想法,当你想提高声音,你很可能会达到您最喜爱的EQ插件和拨号在一个健康的金额

这通常会工作得很好,你可以听到这里使用逻辑的通道均衡的高频段,这个鼓循环是很好的亮堂。您可能会注意到它已经拉响有点“炒作”虽然,这意味着增加的频率是一点点有色及以上处理。

10整个混合声音,想像一下这种效果。你可能会听你的EQ插件,而不是原来你加载的音频文件,。因此,让我们检查出替代... ...

(原始的未经处理的循环)

[音频ID =“1019”]

(河套炒作高端)

[音频ID =“1020”]

02 - 减色法的替代方案

在这里,我们有相同的声音,但我用,而不是增加高端一个搁置的过滤器,以消除一些较低频率的声音。这看起来可能适得其反,但在水平显著提高相结合,最后的结局是一个在更高的频率,提高。

这里真正的区别是,我们没有“补充说:”任何处理,而不是我们已经推动制服它的其他突出的特点,使整体音量的声音的高端品质。

因此,在年底... ...我们听到我们的声音和不太均衡,这是从来没有一件坏事!

(减色处理更加自然循环)

[音频ID =“1022”]

想了解如何提高你的调音技术的吗?退房声波混合,逻辑 403 尺寸-混合 ř

Comments (1)

You must be logged in to comment.

  • KS2 Problema
    An important topic that tyro recordists should give some attention to. Of course you *do* have added processing when using *any* EQ. Even if one uses a strictly passive EQ (filter, no gain) you are still processing the signal, regardless of whether you are working in the analog or digital domain. Not only that, an active filter is simply a passive filter with gain elements added into the circuit. Going a bit farther, with the shelving filter examples given, IF the shelf curves were set up as true equivalencies (overlapping corner frequencies) -- they're not in the example, of course, the low shelf and the high shelf would leave the 'middle' frequencies unaffected as per the graphic representation -- but if they were, and equivalent makeup gain was used after the subtractive pass, the results would be the same, assuming neutral gain processing in the EQ circuitry [gain without saturation or other signal distortions]. The POINT of subtractive EQ vs additive is probably more pertinent when considering the example of a somewhat narrow band that the recordist feels needs more 'definition.' If he exclusively boosts that narrow band (or conversely lowers *everything* else and raises makeup gain) he may get the effect he thinks he wants when considering the track in solo -- but chances are, when he gets it in the mix, there will still be a lot of sonic information in the other frequency bands that is not necessary to the mix and adds distracting detail in bands that may not be carrying the *musical* information. Sometimes, often, even, it's better to remove sonic information outside the desired bands than to boost the desired band. It's not really a *technical* exploit -- but rather a change in thinking and philosophy -- that, used as a gentle and general guide, gets the recordist into thinking about reducing the influence/impact of 'unnecessary' sonic detail -- which will tend to lead the recordist to cleaner, tighter mixes, as a general rule.
    • 5 years ago
    • By: KS2 Problema
    Reply
Feedback
Course Advisor
Don't Know Where To Start?
Ask A Course Advisor
Ask Us!
Copy the link below and paste it into an email, forum, or Facebook to share this with your friends.
Make money when you share our links
Become a macProVideo.com Affiliate!
The current affiliate rate is: 50%
Classes Start Next Week!
Live 8-week Online Certification Classes for: